<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flex Builder CSS annoyance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/2008/08/31/flexbuilder-css-annoyance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/2008/08/31/flexbuilder-css-annoyance/</link>
	<description>en route to a "richer" Internet</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mrinal Wadhwa</title>
		<link>http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/2008/08/31/flexbuilder-css-annoyance/comment-page-1/#comment-29103</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrinal Wadhwa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 13:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/?p=435#comment-29103</guid>
		<description>@K, Flex Builder can be cranky sometimes, but its not that bad try &lt;a href="http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/2008/06/18/flex-builder-performance-tweak/" rel="nofollow"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@K, Flex Builder can be cranky sometimes, but its not that bad try <a href="http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/2008/06/18/flex-builder-performance-tweak/" rel="nofollow">this</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrinal Wadhwa</title>
		<link>http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/2008/08/31/flexbuilder-css-annoyance/comment-page-1/#comment-29102</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrinal Wadhwa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 13:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/?p=435#comment-29102</guid>
		<description>@Manish, if it does either one style, readability will be ok I think .. but generating 'styleName' and suggesting auto completes as 'style-name' is very annoying because I would like my css to look consistent and follow one style .. but if I generate some styles and type in others .. I have to manually change all auto completed styles from styleName to style-name. Yuk !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Manish, if it does either one style, readability will be ok I think .. but generating &#8217;styleName&#8217; and suggesting auto completes as &#8217;style-name&#8217; is very annoying because I would like my css to look consistent and follow one style .. but if I generate some styles and type in others .. I have to manually change all auto completed styles from styleName to style-name. Yuk !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K</title>
		<link>http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/2008/08/31/flexbuilder-css-annoyance/comment-page-1/#comment-29098</link>
		<dc:creator>K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 12:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/?p=435#comment-29098</guid>
		<description>More importantly, why does flex builder feel the need to hang for 15 seconds when i try to type more than 3 words??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More importantly, why does flex builder feel the need to hang for 15 seconds when i try to type more than 3 words??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manish Jethani</title>
		<link>http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/2008/08/31/flexbuilder-css-annoyance/comment-page-1/#comment-29096</link>
		<dc:creator>Manish Jethani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 11:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/?p=435#comment-29096</guid>
		<description>If I remember correctly, it used to generate 'style-name' in the first version. The framework supports only 'styleName'; it is the compiler that translates 'style-name' to 'styleName'. Somebody must have decided that it was better to be consistent with the framework and generate 'styleName' instead.

That still doesn't answer the question: Why 'style-name' at all? I guess readability. 'style-name' is arguably more readable. Camel case sucks, in my not-so-humble opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I remember correctly, it used to generate &#8217;style-name&#8217; in the first version. The framework supports only &#8217;styleName&#8217;; it is the compiler that translates &#8217;style-name&#8217; to &#8217;styleName&#8217;. Somebody must have decided that it was better to be consistent with the framework and generate &#8217;styleName&#8217; instead.</p>
<p>That still doesn&#8217;t answer the question: Why &#8217;style-name&#8217; at all? I guess readability. &#8217;style-name&#8217; is arguably more readable. Camel case sucks, in my not-so-humble opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quentin</title>
		<link>http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/2008/08/31/flexbuilder-css-annoyance/comment-page-1/#comment-29056</link>
		<dc:creator>Quentin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 19:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/?p=435#comment-29056</guid>
		<description>No idea why...
I noticed it also, weird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No idea why&#8230;<br />
I noticed it also, weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
