<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finally ! a cool JavaFx example</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/2008/05/07/finally-a-cool-javafx-example/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/2008/05/07/finally-a-cool-javafx-example/</link>
	<description>en route to a "richer" Internet</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 04:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: tophotely</title>
		<link>http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/2008/05/07/finally-a-cool-javafx-example/#comment-25129</link>
		<dc:creator>tophotely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 19:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/?p=291#comment-25129</guid>
		<description>The first version of JavaFX for the browser and desktop will be delivered by Fall 2008. JavaFX for mobile devices follows in Spring 2009″</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first version of JavaFX for the browser and desktop will be delivered by Fall 2008. JavaFX for mobile devices follows in Spring 2009″</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dorren</title>
		<link>http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/2008/05/07/finally-a-cool-javafx-example/#comment-24550</link>
		<dc:creator>dorren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 17:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/?p=291#comment-24550</guid>
		<description>Just being able to get all java developers (probably 10M out there) interested in JavaFX is already a huge plus. Adobe would kill to get that size of developer base. If Sun doesn't screw this up (they may), JavaFX will be as popular as Flex and SilverLight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just being able to get all java developers (probably 10M out there) interested in JavaFX is already a huge plus. Adobe would kill to get that size of developer base. If Sun doesn&#8217;t screw this up (they may), JavaFX will be as popular as Flex and SilverLight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaushal Karkhanis</title>
		<link>http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/2008/05/07/finally-a-cool-javafx-example/#comment-24549</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaushal Karkhanis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 17:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/?p=291#comment-24549</guid>
		<description>Happy 100th blog post dude! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy 100th blog post dude! <img src='http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrinal Wadhwa</title>
		<link>http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/2008/05/07/finally-a-cool-javafx-example/#comment-24548</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrinal Wadhwa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/?p=291#comment-24548</guid>
		<description>Rob 

It still seems available ... try refreshing your page, youtube sometimes times out the player.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob </p>
<p>It still seems available &#8230; try refreshing your page, youtube sometimes times out the player.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/2008/05/07/finally-a-cool-javafx-example/#comment-24547</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/?p=291#comment-24547</guid>
		<description>Too bad, "We're sorry, this video is no longer availbale..."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad, &#8220;We&#8217;re sorry, this video is no longer availbale&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrinal Wadhwa</title>
		<link>http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/2008/05/07/finally-a-cool-javafx-example/#comment-24544</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrinal Wadhwa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/?p=291#comment-24544</guid>
		<description>@Borek True, it is going to very hard for Sun to overcome the mental block people have against the use of applets</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Borek True, it is going to very hard for Sun to overcome the mental block people have against the use of applets</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrinal Wadhwa</title>
		<link>http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/2008/05/07/finally-a-cool-javafx-example/#comment-24543</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrinal Wadhwa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/?p=291#comment-24543</guid>
		<description>@fredo I don't think they have made the live app available yet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@fredo I don&#8217;t think they have made the live app available yet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Borek</title>
		<link>http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/2008/05/07/finally-a-cool-javafx-example/#comment-24496</link>
		<dc:creator>Borek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/?p=291#comment-24496</guid>
		<description>JavaFX is just a new development model built on top of the "good old JRE" so the browser doesn't really know whether the app was created in plain Java or in JavaFX. Update 10 of the JRE, as mentioned in the video, fixes several issues of the original applets but definitely not all of them. Therefore, JavaFX can be interesting to Java developers out there but I don't thing it will be a big competitor of Flex or Silverlight.

Borek</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JavaFX is just a new development model built on top of the &#8220;good old JRE&#8221; so the browser doesn&#8217;t really know whether the app was created in plain Java or in JavaFX. Update 10 of the JRE, as mentioned in the video, fixes several issues of the original applets but definitely not all of them. Therefore, JavaFX can be interesting to Java developers out there but I don&#8217;t thing it will be a big competitor of Flex or Silverlight.</p>
<p>Borek</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fredo</title>
		<link>http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/2008/05/07/finally-a-cool-javafx-example/#comment-24473</link>
		<dc:creator>fredo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 03:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/?p=291#comment-24473</guid>
		<description>another question, where is the live app URL?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another question, where is the live app URL?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrinal Wadhwa</title>
		<link>http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/2008/05/07/finally-a-cool-javafx-example/#comment-24465</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrinal Wadhwa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 02:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/?p=291#comment-24465</guid>
		<description>Ok so http://openjfx.dev.java.net/ says ..

"The first version of JavaFX for the browser and desktop will be delivered by Fall 2008. JavaFX for mobile devices follows in Spring 2009"

Sun's taking way too long to get this stuff out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok so <a href="http://openjfx.dev.java.net/" rel="nofollow">http://openjfx.dev.java.net/</a> says ..</p>
<p>&#8220;The first version of JavaFX for the browser and desktop will be delivered by Fall 2008. JavaFX for mobile devices follows in Spring 2009&#8243;</p>
<p>Sun&#8217;s taking way too long to get this stuff out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrinal Wadhwa</title>
		<link>http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/2008/05/07/finally-a-cool-javafx-example/#comment-24460</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrinal Wadhwa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 02:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/?p=291#comment-24460</guid>
		<description>LOL !! .. I'm asking myself questions :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL !! .. I&#8217;m asking myself questions <img src='http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrinal Wadhwa</title>
		<link>http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/2008/05/07/finally-a-cool-javafx-example/#comment-24459</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrinal Wadhwa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 02:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/?p=291#comment-24459</guid>
		<description>Another question, is the 3D hardware accelerated even in the browser plugin?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another question, is the 3D hardware accelerated even in the browser plugin?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrinal Wadhwa</title>
		<link>http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/2008/05/07/finally-a-cool-javafx-example/#comment-24457</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrinal Wadhwa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 01:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.mrinalwadhwa.com/?p=291#comment-24457</guid>
		<description>Another question that comes to mind is when is this stuff going to available for building and deploying?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another question that comes to mind is when is this stuff going to available for building and deploying?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
